Where app developers in Poland are
Developers with live apps whose address on Google Play is in Poland, by state or region and by city · rebuilt 9h ago.
- Developers
- 14,073
- Live apps
- 36,919
- Total installs
- 8.3B
- Installs / day
- +2M
with live apps
854 with 1M+ installs
sum of live apps
7-day average
States and regions
States and regions are not read from addresses in Poland; the cities below are.
Cities
top 100| # | City | Developers ↓ | Live apps | Total installs | Installs/day | 1M+ apps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Warsaw | 2,470 | 6,301 | 2.2B | +645.9K | 257 |
| 2 | Kraków | 861 | 2,416 | 913.3M | +138.6K | 64 |
| 3 | Wrocław | 670 | 1,532 | 1.5B | +488.5K | 71 |
| 4 | Poznań | 509 | 1,620 | 460.9M | +161.7K | 54 |
| 5 | Gdańsk | 381 | 968 | 281M | +76.9K | 41 |
| 6 | Łódź | 313 | 1,383 | 115M | +45.4K | 13 |
| 7 | Katowice | 200 | 393 | 44.2M | +10.2K | 8 |
| 8 | Lublin | 197 | 491 | 27M | +4.3K | 7 |
| 9 | Szczecin | 169 | 406 | 87.3M | +15K | 15 |
| 10 | Rzeszów | 157 | 434 | 240.9M | +29.4K | 15 |
| 11 | Gdynia | 154 | 482 | 11.5M | +3.7K | 1 |
| 12 | Białystok | 141 | 338 | 29.4M | +5.2K | 4 |
| 13 | Bydgoszcz | 112 | 327 | 183M | +54.5K | 7 |
| 14 | Bielsko-Biała | 92 | 287 | 72.8M | +6.2K | 18 |
| 15 | Gliwice | 84 | 216 | 204.6M | +28.5K | 15 |
| 16 | Kielce | 75 | 152 | 21.4M | +1.3K | 4 |
| 17 | Zielona Góra | 68 | 331 | 40.6M | +2.7K | 5 |
| 18 | Olsztyn | 67 | 145 | 1.6M | +398 | 0 |
| 19 | Opole | 66 | 256 | 49.5M | +1.2K | 12 |
| 20 | Radom | 62 | 112 | 71.7M | +12.7K | 5 |
| 21 | Toruń | 59 | 141 | 2M | +149 | 0 |
| 22 | Częstochowa | 53 | 110 | 16.4M | +218 | 6 |
| 23 | Rybnik | 39 | 70 | 270.2K | +490 | 0 |
| 24 | Tychy | 39 | 86 | 92.4M | +415 | 5 |
| 25 | Chorzów | 38 | 61 | 115.2M | +23.1K | 2 |
| 26 | Piaseczno | 35 | 85 | 20.9M | +1.1K | 2 |
| 27 | Koszalin | 33 | 126 | 7.5M | +499 | 1 |
| 28 | Tarnów | 33 | 129 | 19.6M | +2.6K | 4 |
| 29 | Sopot | 32 | 67 | 3M | +895 | 1 |
| 30 | Gorzów Wielkopolski | 31 | 78 | 10.1M | +169 | 3 |
| 31 | Kalisz | 29 | 72 | 23.3M | +86 | 4 |
| 32 | Zabrze | 29 | 2,483 | 1.5M | +885 | 0 |
| 33 | Bytom | 27 | 66 | 2.5M | +68 | 1 |
| 34 | Sosnowiec | 26 | 39 | 1.8M | +5 | 1 |
| 35 | Pruszków | 24 | 71 | 57.3M | +5.1K | 15 |
| 36 | Elbląg | 23 | 45 | 2.7M | +4 | 1 |
| 37 | Dąbrowa Górnicza | 22 | 156 | 1.3M | +223 | 0 |
| 38 | Płock | 22 | 39 | 10.7M | +5.8K | 1 |
| 39 | Biała Podlaska | 21 | 36 | 245.9K | +264 | 0 |
| 40 | Słupsk | 21 | 39 | 41.7K | +309 | 0 |
| 41 | Grodzisk Mazowiecki | 20 | 75 | 76.4M | +11.5K | 8 |
| 42 | Wieliczka | 20 | 38 | 472.2K | +952 | 0 |
| 43 | Marki | 19 | 32 | 48.9M | +33.4K | 2 |
| 44 | Jelenia Góra | 18 | 49 | 1.1M | +144 | 0 |
| 45 | Leszno | 18 | 35 | 79.4K | +95 | 0 |
| 46 | Nowy Sącz | 18 | 39 | 489.2K | +6 | 0 |
| 47 | Dębica | 17 | 23 | 485.7K | +92 | 0 |
| 48 | Mysłowice | 17 | 27 | 321.5K | +29 | 0 |
| 49 | Piła | 17 | 22 | 34.2K | 0 | 0 |
| 50 | Mielec | 16 | 23 | 4.6M | +35 | 2 |
| 51 | Puławy | 16 | 19 | 29.8K | +3 | 0 |
| 52 | Ruda Śląska | 16 | 27 | 6.5M | 0 | 1 |
| 53 | Suwałki | 16 | 22 | 1.9M | +53 | 1 |
| 54 | Legnica | 15 | 47 | 97.6K | +32 | 0 |
| 55 | Ostrów Wielkopolski | 15 | 40 | 283.2K | +41 | 0 |
| 56 | Tarnowskie Góry | 15 | 17 | 934.3K | +27 | 0 |
| 57 | Grudziądz | 14 | 35 | 521.2K | +31 | 0 |
| 58 | Konstancin-Jeziorna | 14 | 21 | 161.1K | +34 | 0 |
| 59 | Krosno | 14 | 18 | 8.5M | +17 | 1 |
| 60 | Łomża | 14 | 20 | 647.6K | +573 | 0 |
| 61 | Mikołów | 14 | 23 | 222.6K | +2.7K | 0 |
| 62 | Piotrków Trybunalski | 14 | 52 | 5.5M | +84 | 1 |
| 63 | Żory | 14 | 51 | 902.2K | +575 | 0 |
| 64 | Aleksandrów Łódzki | 13 | 29 | 239.6K | +65 | 0 |
| 65 | Gniezno | 13 | 31 | 107.9K | +34 | 0 |
| 66 | Łomianki | 13 | 52 | 76.7K | +554 | 0 |
| 67 | Luboń | 13 | 34 | 33.8K | +25 | 0 |
| 68 | Mińsk Mazowiecki | 13 | 30 | 406.4K | +89 | 0 |
| 69 | Oświęcim | 13 | 28 | 138.2K | +149 | 0 |
| 70 | Ożarów Mazowiecki | 13 | 16 | 364.5K | +123 | 0 |
| 71 | Racibórz | 13 | 23 | 19.5M | +949 | 2 |
| 72 | Siedlce | 13 | 18 | 105.6K | +97 | 0 |
| 73 | Ełk | 12 | 18 | 13.6K | +8 | 0 |
| 74 | Legionowo | 12 | 22 | 388.2K | +61 | 0 |
| 75 | Lubliniec | 12 | 21 | 10.9K | 0 | 0 |
| 76 | Przeźmierowo | 12 | 18 | 427.4K | +41 | 0 |
| 77 | Konin | 11 | 29 | 307.4K | +4 | 0 |
| 78 | Lubin | 11 | 40 | 4.9M | +1 | 1 |
| 79 | Otwock | 11 | 14 | 23.9K | +22 | 0 |
| 80 | Sanok | 11 | 30 | 6.9K | +31 | 0 |
| 81 | Siemianowice Śląskie | 11 | 22 | 519.9K | +185 | 0 |
| 82 | Stalowa Wola | 11 | 28 | 639.3K | +19 | 0 |
| 83 | Suchy Las | 11 | 14 | 1.6M | +356 | 1 |
| 84 | Wejherowo | 11 | 19 | 210.9K | +4 | 0 |
| 85 | Ząbki | 11 | 70 | 415.6K | +476 | 0 |
| 86 | Zawiercie | 11 | 29 | 16.6K | +114 | 0 |
| 87 | Inowrocław | 10 | 16 | 172.1K | +7 | 0 |
| 88 | Jastrzębie-Zdrój | 10 | 46 | 20.3M | +3.9K | 2 |
| 89 | Jaworzno | 10 | 17 | 11.3K | 0 | 0 |
| 90 | Kołobrzeg | 10 | 21 | 5.7K | 0 | 0 |
| 91 | Michałowice | 10 | 24 | 21.9K | +4 | 0 |
| 92 | Radomsko | 10 | 18 | 134.9K | 0 | 0 |
| 93 | Ustroń | 10 | 11 | 30.8K | +5 | 0 |
| 94 | Wałbrzych | 10 | 16 | 961.8K | +5 | 0 |
| 95 | Włocławek | 10 | 21 | 3.3M | +27 | 2 |
| 96 | Gostyń | 9 | 18 | 299.1K | +1 | 0 |
| 97 | Komorniki | 9 | 16 | 4.3M | +1.9K | 1 |
| 98 | Lubartów | 9 | 25 | 5.4M | +44 | 1 |
| 99 | Myślenice | 9 | 21 | 867.8K | 0 | 0 |
| 100 | Niepołomice | 9 | 34 | 1.9M | +167 | 0 |
How it works
Each developer’s country, state and city come from the postal address in the “App support” section of its Google Play listing; the address itself is not shown. Counts cover developers with at least one live app, and a city is listed once it has three of them; installs are Google Play’s exact counters summed over live apps, per day is the 7-day average, and 1M+ apps are live apps with a million installs or more. Developers whose address names no country are left out. Rebuilt once a day.